Head-to-head comparison

Lynk & Co 02 vs XPeng G9

Lynk & Co 02

Lynk & Co

02

Compared version: 02 Core+

from€37,490

6 dealers · 5 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Good

Ranked #11 of 16 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)Hatchback

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

  • Value · €21,900 cheaper (−37%)+29 pts

Trade-offs

  • Charging · DC charging 150 kW (−295)−45 pts
  • Practicality · boot 410 l (−250)−30 pts
  • Range · −67 km (−13%)−19 pts
View model
XPeng G9

XPeng

G9

Compared version: Standard range

from€59,390

4 dealers · 4 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #5 of 16 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

  • Charging · DC charging 445 kW (+295)+45 pts
  • Practicality · boot 660 l (+250)+30 pts
  • Range · +67 km (+15%)+19 pts

Trade-offs

  • Value−29 pts
  • Price · €21,900 more expensive (+58%)
View model

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

  • Value

    Lynk & Co 02+29 pts

  • Range

    XPeng G9+19 pts

  • Performance

    XPeng G9+9 pts

  • Safety

    XPeng G9+12 pts

  • Practicality

    XPeng G9+30 pts

  • Charging

    XPeng G9+45 pts

Lynk & Co 02 is the cheapest; XPeng G9 costs €21,900 more (+58%).

XPeng G9 has the longest range; Lynk & Co 02 has 67 km less (−13%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

Lynk & Co 0260
XPeng G969

Value

Lynk & Co 0273
XPeng G944

Range

Lynk & Co 0253
XPeng G972

Performance

Lynk & Co 0260
XPeng G969

Safety

Lynk & Co 0263
XPeng G975

Practicality

Lynk & Co 0252
XPeng G982

Charging

Lynk & Co 0255
XPeng G9100

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

  • ✓best in the comparison
  • ≈equal: within 5% of the best
  • 5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
  • > 20%far behind: more than 20%
  • n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

Lynk & Co

02

€37,490

XPeng

G9

€59,390

Price from

€37,490

best

€59,390

+58%+21,900 €
Top price in range

€41,490

€73,890

Warranty

4 years

−20%−1 year

5 years / 160,000 km

best
Battery capacity

66 kWh

−16%−13 kWh

6.6 km/kWh

79 kWh

best

6.4 km/kWh

WLTP range

435 km

−13%−67 km

€86/km

502 km

best

€118/km

DC charging power

150 kW

−66%−295 kW

445 kW

best
DC charging time

30 min

+150%+18 min

12 min

best
AC charging power

11 kW

11 kW

Power

272 hp · 200 kW

−21%−74 hp

€138/hp

346 hp · 258 kW

best

€172/hp

Torque

343 Nm

−26%−122 Nm

465 Nm

best
Top speed

180 km/h

−10%−20 km/h

200 km/h

best
0–100 km/h

5.5 s

best

6.6 s

+20%+1.1 s
Drive

RWD

RWD

Length
n/a

4,891 mm

Width
n/a

1,937 mm

Height
n/a

1,680 mm

Wheelbase

2,755 mm

−8%−243 mm

2,998 mm

best
Boot volume

410 l

−38%−250 l

660 l

best
Seats

5

5

Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

5 ★

Data verified
09/26/2026
09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

Lynk & Co 02

No verified facts yet

View the model page

XPeng G9

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the Lynk & Co 02 or the XPeng G9?

The Lynk & Co 02 is cheaper, starting at €37,490 versus €59,390 for the XPeng G9 — a difference of €21,900.

Which has more range, the Lynk & Co 02 or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 has more range: 502 km versus 435 km WLTP, 67 km more.

Which is more powerful, the Lynk & Co 02 or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 is more powerful: 346 hp versus 272 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the Lynk & Co 02 or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 scores higher overall: 69/100 versus 60/100.

Add more models to this comparison