Head-to-head comparison

XPeng G9 vs Zeekr 7GT

2nd place3/7

XPeng

G9

Compared version: Standard range

from€59,390

4 dealers · 4 counties

69/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #5 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Practicality · boot 660 l (+204)+19 pts

Trade-offs

Value−27 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 6.6 s (+1.3 s)−15 pts
Range · −17 km (−3%)−5 pts

View model

Winner4/7

Zeekr

7GT

Compared version: Core RWD

from€46,490

2 dealers · 2 counties

76/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #1 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)Wagon

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Value · €12,900 cheaper (−22%)+27 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 5.3 s (−1.3 s)+15 pts
Range · +17 km (+3%)+5 pts

Trade-offs

Practicality · boot 456 l (−204)−19 pts

View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

XPeng

Zeekr

7GT

Zeekr 7GT leads: 4 of 7 criteria won clearly. 7 criteria are tied.

Price & warranty01
Battery & charging21
Performance02
Dimensions & practicality10
Safetytie

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

Value
Zeekr 7GT+27 pts
Range
Zeekr 7GT+5 pts
Performance
Zeekr 7GT+15 pts
Safety
tight
Practicality
XPeng G9+19 pts
Charging
tight

Zeekr 7GT is the cheapest; XPeng G9 costs €12,900 more (+28%).

Zeekr 7GT has the longest range; XPeng G9 has 17 km less (−3%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

XPeng G969

Zeekr 7GT76

Value

+27 pts

XPeng G944

Zeekr 7GT71

Range

+5 pts

XPeng G972

Zeekr 7GT77

Performance

+15 pts

XPeng G969

Zeekr 7GT84

Safety

tight

XPeng G975

Zeekr 7GT75

Practicality

+19 pts

XPeng G982

Zeekr 7GT63

Charging

tight

XPeng G9100

Zeekr 7GT100

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

XPeng

€59,390

Zeekr

7GT

€46,490

Price from

€59,390

+28%+12,900 €

€46,490

Top price in range

€73,890

€59,690

Warranty

5 years / 160,000 km

5 years / 100,000 km

Battery capacity

79 kWh

6.4 km/kWh

75 kWh

−5%−4 kWh

6.9 km/kWh

WLTP range

502 km

≈ equal

€118/km

519 km

€90/km

DC charging power

445 kW

≈ equal

450 kW

DC charging time

12 min

13 min

+8%+1 min

AC charging power

11 kW

−50%−11 kW

22 kW

Power

346 hp · 258 kW

−18%−75 hp

€172/hp

421 hp · 310 kW

€110/hp

Torque

465 Nm

n/a

Top speed

200 km/h

≈ equal

210 km/h

0–100 km/h

6.6 s

+25%+1.3 s

5.3 s

Drive

RWD

Length

4,891 mm

4,817 mm

Width

1,937 mm

1,910 mm

Height

1,680 mm

1,456 mm

Wheelbase

2,998 mm

2,900 mm

≈ equal

Boot volume

660 l

456 l

−31%−204 l

Seats

Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

Data verified

09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

XPeng G9

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Zeekr 7GT

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with XPeng G9

More comparisons with Zeekr 7GT

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 7GT?

The Zeekr 7GT is cheaper, starting at €46,490 versus €59,390 for the XPeng G9 — a difference of €12,900.

Which has more range, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 7GT?

The Zeekr 7GT has more range: 519 km versus 502 km WLTP, 17 km more.

Which is more powerful, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 7GT?

The Zeekr 7GT is more powerful: 421 hp versus 346 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 7GT?

The Zeekr 7GT scores higher overall: 76/100 versus 69/100.

Add more models to this comparison