Head-to-head comparison

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid vs XPeng G9

2nd place2/8

EHS Plug-in Hybrid

Compared version: NOUL EHS 1,5 T-Gdi 2+1 AT Excite

from€39,644

31 dealers · 28 counties

73/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #4 of 17 ranked plug-in hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)SUV

Data: 10/10 fields

Leads on

Value · €19,746 cheaper (−33%)+25 pts
Safety · warranty 7 years (+2)+25 pts
Range+12 pts

Trade-offs

Practicality · boot 441 l (−219)−29 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 6.8 s (+0.2 s)−11 pts

View model

Winner6/8

XPeng

G9

Compared version: Standard range

from€59,390

4 dealers · 4 counties

69/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #5 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Practicality · boot 660 l (+219)+29 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 6.6 s (−0.2 s)+11 pts

Trade-offs

Value−25 pts
Safety · warranty 5 years (−2)−25 pts
Range−12 pts

View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

EHS Plug-in Hybrid

XPeng

XPeng G9 leads: 6 of 8 criteria won clearly. 5 criteria are tied.

Price & warranty20
Battery & charging03
Performance01
Dimensions & practicality02
Safetytie

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

You are comparing different categories: plug-in hybrid (MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid) and electric (XPeng G9). The Charging axis does not apply to every model, so we compare on Value, Range, Performance, Safety, and Practicality. Overall scores are not directly comparable across categories.

Value
MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid+25 pts
Range
MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid+12 pts
Performance
XPeng G9+11 pts
Safety
MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid+25 pts
Practicality
XPeng G9+29 pts
Charging
does not apply

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid is the cheapest; XPeng G9 costs €19,746 more (+50%).

XPeng G9 has the longest range; MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid has 393 km less (−78%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score· not directly comparable across categories

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid73

XPeng G969

Value

+25 pts

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid69

XPeng G944

Range

+12 pts

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid84

XPeng G972

Performance

+11 pts

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid58

XPeng G969

Safety

+25 pts

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid100

XPeng G975

Practicality

+29 pts

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid53

XPeng G982

Charging

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid—

XPeng G9100

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

EHS Plug-in Hybrid

€39,644

XPeng

€59,390

Price from

€39,644

€59,390

+50%+19,746 €

Top price in range

€41,678

€73,890

Warranty

7 years / 150,000 km

5 years / 160,000 km

−29%−2 years

Battery capacity

21.4 kWh

−73%−57.6 kWh

5.1 km/kWh

79 kWh

6.4 km/kWh

WLTP range

109 km

−78%−393 km

€364/km

502 km

€118/km

DC charging power

n/a

445 kW

DC charging time

n/a

12 min

AC charging power

6.6 kW

−40%−4.4 kW

11 kW

Power

272 hp · 200 kW

−21%−74 hp

€146/hp

346 hp · 258 kW

€172/hp

Torque

480 Nm

465 Nm

≈ equal

Top speed

190 km/h

≈ equal

200 km/h

0–100 km/h

6.8 s

≈ equal

6.6 s

Drive

FWD

RWD

Length

4,670 mm

4,891 mm

Width

1,890 mm

1,937 mm

Height

1,664 mm

1,680 mm

Wheelbase

2,750 mm

−8%−248 mm

2,998 mm

Boot volume

441 l

−33%−219 l

660 l

Seats

Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

EU homologated

Yes

n/a

Data verified

09/27/2026

09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid

SafetyNovember 15, 2024

Euro NCAP (noiembrie 2024): noul MG HS 5 stele – Adulți 90%, Copii 85%, Pietoni 83%, Asistență 74%.

HSEuro NCAP

carguide.phmediasecondary sourceEurope / global

TestsJuly 2025

ADAC Autotest MG HS (2025): consum Ecotest 1,6 l benzină + 18,5 kWh/100 km, notă generală 2,4; distanță de frânare 38,0 m; încărcare doar AC 6,6 kW (peste 3 ore); monitorizare șofer prea sensibilă; recunoaștere limite de viteză nefiabilă.

HS PHEVIndependent tests (ADAC, Green NCAP, Autocritica)

adac.deofficialEurope / global

WarrantyJune 24, 2025

Declarația de garanție MG România (24.06.2025): garanție 84 luni sau 150.000 km, incluzând bateria de înaltă tensiune – acoperită dacă capacitatea scade sub 70% din valoarea inițială; baterie 12V 2 ani; taxi/uz comercial 3 ani/100.000 km; garanție transferabilă; reparații doar în service autorizat MG.

Warranty & assistance

static.mgcluj.romediaRomania

SafetyApril 18, 2023

Singura alertă EU Safety Gate (RAPEX) găsită pentru MG: MG eHS (2022), publicată pe 18.04.2023 – cablul de împământare al elementului de încălzire nu era fixat corect și se putea desprinde, cu risc de incendiu.

eHSRecalls

car-recalls.euofficialsecondary sourceEurope / global

XPeng G9

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid

More comparisons with XPeng G9

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid or the XPeng G9?

The MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid is cheaper, starting at €39,644 versus €59,390 for the XPeng G9 — a difference of €19,746.

Which has more range, the MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 has more range: 502 km versus 109 km WLTP, 393 km more.

Which is more powerful, the MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 is more powerful: 346 hp versus 272 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid or the XPeng G9?

The MG EHS Plug-in Hybrid scores higher overall: 73/100 versus 69/100.

Add more models to this comparison