Head-to-head comparison

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H vs XPeng G9

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H

Jaecoo

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H

Compared version: JAECOO 7 SHS-H CONFORT

from€34,490

12 dealers · 12 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #6 of 19 ranked combustion

Hybrid (HEV)SUVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 8/9 fields

Leads on

  • Value · €24,900 cheaper (−42%)+28 pts
  • Safety · warranty 7 years (+2)+25 pts

Trade-offs

  • Practicality · boot 412 l (−248)−35 pts
  • Performance · 0–100 km/h in 8.9 s (+2.3 s)−27 pts
View model
XPeng G9

XPeng

G9

Compared version: Standard range

from€59,390

4 dealers · 4 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #5 of 16 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

  • Practicality · boot 660 l (+248)+35 pts
  • Performance · 0–100 km/h in 6.6 s (−2.3 s)+27 pts

Trade-offs

  • Value−28 pts
  • Safety · warranty 5 years (−2)−25 pts
  • Price · €24,900 more expensive (+72%)
View model

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

You are comparing different categories: combustion (Jaecoo 7 SHS-H) and electric (XPeng G9). The Range and Charging axes do not apply to every model, so we compare on Value, Performance, Safety, and Practicality. Overall scores are not directly comparable across categories.

  • Value

    Jaecoo 7 SHS-H+28 pts

  • Range

    does not apply

  • Performance

    XPeng G9+27 pts

  • Safety

    Jaecoo 7 SHS-H+25 pts

  • Practicality

    XPeng G9+35 pts

  • Charging

    does not apply

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H is the cheapest; XPeng G9 costs €24,900 more (+72%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score· not directly comparable across categories

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H66
XPeng G969

Value

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H72
XPeng G944

Range

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H—
XPeng G972

Performance

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H42
XPeng G969

Safety

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H100
XPeng G975

Practicality

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H47
XPeng G982

Charging

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H—
XPeng G9100

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

  • ✓best in the comparison
  • ≈equal: within 5% of the best
  • 5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
  • > 20%far behind: more than 20%
  • n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H

€34,490

XPeng

G9

€59,390

Price from

€34,490

best

€59,390

+72%+24,900 €
Top price in range

€37,490

€73,890

Warranty

7 years / 150,000 km

best

5 years / 160,000 km

−29%−2 years
Battery capacity

1.8 kWh

−98%−77.2 kWh

79 kWh

best
WLTP range
n/a

502 km

DC charging power
n/a

445 kW

DC charging time
n/a

12 min

AC charging power
n/a

11 kW

Power

224 hp · 165 kW

−35%−122 hp

€154/hp

346 hp · 258 kW

best

€172/hp

Torque
n/a

465 Nm

Top speed

180 km/h

−10%−20 km/h

200 km/h

best
0–100 km/h

8.9 s

+35%+2.3 s

6.6 s

best
Drive

FWD

RWD

Length
n/a

4,891 mm

Width
n/a

1,937 mm

Height
n/a

1,680 mm

Wheelbase

2,672 mm

−11%−326 mm

2,998 mm

best
Boot volume

412 l

−38%−248 l

660 l

best
Seats

5

5

Euro NCAP rating

not tested

5 ★

EU homologated

Yes

n/a
Data verified
09/26/2026
09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H

No verified facts yet

View the model page

XPeng G9

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the Jaecoo 7 SHS-H or the XPeng G9?

The Jaecoo 7 SHS-H is cheaper, starting at €34,490 versus €59,390 for the XPeng G9 — a difference of €24,900.

Which is more powerful, the Jaecoo 7 SHS-H or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 is more powerful: 346 hp versus 224 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the Jaecoo 7 SHS-H or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 scores higher overall: 69/100 versus 66/100.

Add more models to this comparison