Head-to-head comparison

MGS9 PHEV vs Omoda 7 SHS-P

MGS9 PHEV

Compared version: Comfort

from€41,990

31 dealers · 28 counties

77/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #2 of 17 ranked plug-in hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)SUV

Data: 8/10 fields

Leads on

Practicality · 7 seats+30 pts
Value · €1,500 cheaper (−3%)+19 pts
Range · +10 km (+11%)+14 pts

Trade-offs

No trade-off of 5 points or more

View model

Omoda

Omoda 7 SHS-P

Compared version: Exclusive

from€43,490

14 dealers · 14 counties

62/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Good

Ranked #8 of 17 ranked plug-in hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)SUVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 7/10 fields

Leads on

No lead of 5 points or more

Trade-offs

Practicality · 5 seats−30 pts
Value · €1,500 more expensive (+4%)−19 pts
Range · −10 km (−10%)−14 pts

View model

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

Value
MGS9 PHEV+19 pts
Range
MGS9 PHEV+14 pts
Performance
MGS9 PHEV+11 pts
Safety
tight
Practicality
MGS9 PHEV+30 pts

MGS9 PHEV is the cheapest; Omoda 7 SHS-P costs €1,500 more (+4%).

MGS9 PHEV has the longest range; Omoda 7 SHS-P has 10 km less (−10%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

MGS9 PHEV77

Omoda 7 SHS-P62

Value

MGS9 PHEV68

Omoda 7 SHS-P49

Range

MGS9 PHEV71

Omoda 7 SHS-P57

Performance

MGS9 PHEV53

Omoda 7 SHS-P42

Safety

MGS9 PHEV100

Omoda 7 SHS-P100

Practicality

MGS9 PHEV100

Omoda 7 SHS-P70

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

✓best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

MGS9 PHEV

€41,990

Omoda 7 SHS-P

€43,490

Price from

€41,990

€43,490

≈ equal

Top price in range

€43,990

€44,690

Warranty

7 years / 150,000 km

−13%−1 year

8 years / 160,000 km

Battery capacity

24.7 kWh

4 km/kWh

18.4 kWh

−26%−6.3 kWh

4.9 km/kWh

WLTP range

100 km

€420/km

90 km

−10%−10 km

€483/km

AC charging power

11 kW

n/a

Power

299 hp · 220 kW

€140/hp

204 hp · 150 kW

−32%−95 hp

€213/hp

Top speed

200 km/h

180 km/h

−10%−20 km/h

0–100 km/h

9.6 s

+14%+1.2 s

8.4 s

Drive

FWD

Seats

−29%−2

Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

not tested

EU homologated

Yes

Data verified

09/27/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

MGS9 PHEV

WarrantyJune 24, 2025

Declarația de garanție MG România (24.06.2025): garanție 84 luni sau 150.000 km, incluzând bateria de înaltă tensiune – acoperită dacă capacitatea scade sub 70% din valoarea inițială; baterie 12V 2 ani; taxi/uz comercial 3 ani/100.000 km; garanție transferabilă; reparații doar în service autorizat MG.

Warranty & assistance

static.mgcluj.romediaRomania

Omoda 7 SHS-P

WarrantyOctober 2025

Omoda & Jaecoo au fost lansate oficial în România în octombrie 2025 cu garanție 7 ani/150.000 km pe vehicul și 8 ani/160.000 km pe baterie, plus o ofertă promoțională de garanție de 1 milion km pe motorul termic (cu condiții).

Warranty & assistance

carvolo.romediasecondary sourceRomania

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with MGS9 PHEV

More comparisons with Omoda 7 SHS-P

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the MGS9 PHEV or the Omoda 7 SHS-P?

The MGS9 PHEV is cheaper, starting at €41,990 versus €43,490 for the Omoda 7 SHS-P — a difference of €1,500.

Which has more range, the MGS9 PHEV or the Omoda 7 SHS-P?

The MGS9 PHEV has more range: 100 km versus 90 km WLTP, 10 km more.

Which is more powerful, the MGS9 PHEV or the Omoda 7 SHS-P?

The MGS9 PHEV is more powerful: 299 hp versus 204 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the MGS9 PHEV or the Omoda 7 SHS-P?

The MGS9 PHEV scores higher overall: 77/100 versus 62/100.

Add more models to this comparison