Head-to-head comparison

MGS9 PHEV vs Omoda 9 SHS-P

MGS9 PHEV

MG

MGS9 PHEV

Compared version: Comfort

from€41,990

31 dealers · 28 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #2 of 17 ranked plug-in hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)SUV

Data: 8/10 fields

Leads on

  • Practicality · 7 seats+30 pts

Trade-offs

  • Performance · 0–100 km/h in 9.6 s (+4.7 s)−37 pts
  • Range · −45 km (−31%)−29 pts
View model

Omoda

Omoda 9 SHS-P

Compared version: Exclusive

from€52,990

12 dealers · 12 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Excellent

Ranked #1 of 17 ranked plug-in hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)SUV

Data: 7/10 fields

Leads on

  • Performance · 0–100 km/h in 4.9 s (−4.7 s)+37 pts
  • Range · +45 km (+45%)+29 pts

Trade-offs

  • Practicality · 5 seats−30 pts
  • Price · €11,000 more expensive (+26%)
View model

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

  • Value

    tight

  • Range

    Omoda 9 SHS-P+29 pts

  • Performance

    Omoda 9 SHS-P+37 pts

  • Safety

    tight

  • Practicality

    MGS9 PHEV+30 pts

MGS9 PHEV is the cheapest; Omoda 9 SHS-P costs €11,000 more (+26%).

Omoda 9 SHS-P has the longest range; MGS9 PHEV has 45 km less (−31%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

MGS9 PHEV77
Omoda 9 SHS-P83

Value

MGS9 PHEV68
Omoda 9 SHS-P64

Range

MGS9 PHEV71
Omoda 9 SHS-P100

Performance

MGS9 PHEV53
Omoda 9 SHS-P90

Safety

MGS9 PHEV100
Omoda 9 SHS-P100

Practicality

MGS9 PHEV100
Omoda 9 SHS-P70

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

  • ✓best in the comparison
  • ≈equal: within 5% of the best
  • 5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
  • > 20%far behind: more than 20%
  • n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

MGS9 PHEV

€41,990

Omoda 9 SHS-P

€52,990

Price from

€41,990

best

€52,990

+26%+11,000 €
Top price in range

€43,990

€55,080

Warranty

7 years / 150,000 km

7 years / 150,000 km

Battery capacity

24.7 kWh

−28%−9.8 kWh

4 km/kWh

34.5 kWh

best

4.2 km/kWh

WLTP range

100 km

−31%−45 km

€420/km

145 km

best

€365/km

AC charging power

11 kW

n/a
Power

299 hp · 220 kW

−35%−163 hp

€140/hp

462 hp · 340 kW

best

€115/hp

Top speed

200 km/h

n/a
0–100 km/h

9.6 s

+96%+4.7 s

4.9 s

best
Drive

FWD

AWD

Seats

7

best

5

−29%−2
Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

5 ★

EU homologated

Yes

Yes

Data verified
09/27/2026
09/27/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

MGS9 PHEV

Declarația de garanție MG România (24.06.2025): garanție 84 luni sau 150.000 km, incluzând bateria de înaltă tensiune – acoperită dacă capacitatea scade sub 70% din valoarea inițială; baterie 12V 2 ani; taxi/uz comercial 3 ani/100.000 km; garanție transferabilă; reparații doar în service autorizat MG.

Warranty & assistance
static.mgcluj.romediaRomania

Omoda 9 SHS-P

Warranty

Omoda & Jaecoo au fost lansate oficial în România în octombrie 2025 cu garanție 7 ani/150.000 km pe vehicul și 8 ani/160.000 km pe baterie, plus o ofertă promoțională de garanție de 1 milion km pe motorul termic (cu condiții).

Warranty & assistance
carvolo.romediasecondary sourceRomania

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the MGS9 PHEV or the Omoda 9 SHS-P?

The MGS9 PHEV is cheaper, starting at €41,990 versus €52,990 for the Omoda 9 SHS-P — a difference of €11,000.

Which has more range, the MGS9 PHEV or the Omoda 9 SHS-P?

The Omoda 9 SHS-P has more range: 145 km versus 100 km WLTP, 45 km more.

Which is more powerful, the MGS9 PHEV or the Omoda 9 SHS-P?

The Omoda 9 SHS-P is more powerful: 462 hp versus 299 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the MGS9 PHEV or the Omoda 9 SHS-P?

The Omoda 9 SHS-P scores higher overall: 83/100 versus 77/100.

Add more models to this comparison