Head-to-head comparison

Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid vs Omoda 9 SHS-P

Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid

Forthing

Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid

Compared version: Forthing 5, Full-HYBRID, Automat, benzină, 1.5

from€37,250

5 dealers · 5 counties

Unranked — insufficient data

missing: performance · missing: safety & warranty · coverage below 70 %

Hybrid (HEV)SUVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 4/9 fields

Leads on

  • Value · €15,740 cheaper (−30%)+5 pts

Trade-offs

  • Practicality−16 pts
View model
Omoda 9 SHS-P

Omoda

Omoda 9 SHS-P

Compared version: Exclusive

from€52,990

14 dealers · 14 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Excellent

Ranked #1 of 17 ranked plug-in hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)SUV

Data: 7/10 fields

Leads on

  • Practicality+16 pts

Trade-offs

  • Value−5 pts
  • Price · €15,740 more expensive (+42%)
View model

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

You are comparing different categories: combustion (Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid) and plug-in hybrid (Omoda 9 SHS-P). The Range axis does not apply to every model, so we compare on Value, Performance, Safety, and Practicality. Overall scores are not directly comparable across categories.

Incomplete comparison. Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid has no: power, 0–100 acceleration, top speed, Euro NCAP rating, and warranty. Its strengths may be understated; missing data is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage.

  • Value

    Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid+5 pts

  • Range

    does not apply

  • Performance

    not enough data

  • Safety

    not enough data

  • Practicality

    Omoda 9 SHS-P+16 pts

Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid is the cheapest; Omoda 9 SHS-P costs €15,740 more (+42%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score· not directly comparable across categories

Forthing 5 Full-Hybridunranked
Omoda 9 SHS-P83

Value

Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid69
Omoda 9 SHS-P64

Range

Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid—
Omoda 9 SHS-P100

Performance

Forthing 5 Full-Hybridn/a
Omoda 9 SHS-P90

Safety

Forthing 5 Full-Hybridn/a
Omoda 9 SHS-P100

Practicality

Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid54
Omoda 9 SHS-P70

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

  • ✓best in the comparison
  • ≈equal: within 5% of the best
  • 5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
  • > 20%far behind: more than 20%
  • n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid

€37,250

Omoda 9 SHS-P

€52,990

Price from

€37,250

best

€52,990

+42%+15,740 €
Top price in range
n/a

€55,080

Warranty
n/a

7 years / 150,000 km

Battery capacity

2 kWh

−94%−32.5 kWh

34.5 kWh

best
WLTP range
n/a

145 km

Power
n/a

462 hp · 340 kW

Torque

300 Nm

n/a
0–100 km/h
n/a

4.9 s

Drive

FWD

AWD

Length

4,595 mm

n/a
Width

1,865 mm

n/a
Height

1,680 mm

n/a
Wheelbase

2,715 mm

n/a
Boot volume

480 l

n/a
Seats

5

5

Euro NCAP rating

not tested

5 ★

EU homologated
n/a

Yes

Data verified
09/27/2026
09/27/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Omoda 9 SHS-P

Warranty

Omoda & Jaecoo au fost lansate oficial în România în octombrie 2025 cu garanție 7 ani/150.000 km pe vehicul și 8 ani/160.000 km pe baterie, plus o ofertă promoțională de garanție de 1 milion km pe motorul termic (cu condiții).

Warranty & assistance
carvolo.romediasecondary sourceRomania

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid or the Omoda 9 SHS-P?

The Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid is cheaper, starting at €37,250 versus €52,990 for the Omoda 9 SHS-P — a difference of €15,740.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the Forthing 5 Full-Hybrid or the Omoda 9 SHS-P?

The Omoda 9 SHS-P scores higher overall: 83/100 versus 63/100.

Add more models to this comparison