Head-to-head comparison

BYD Tang vs BYD Sealion 7

Winner7/9
BYD Tang

BYD

Tang

Entry version

Price not published

29 dealers · 25 counties

Unranked — insufficient data

not sold in Romania, or availability unconfirmed · no published price · missing: value

Battery Electric (BEV)SUVNot sold in Romania

Data: 11/12 fields

Leads on

  • Performance · 0–100 km/h in 4.6 s (−2.1 s)+15 pts
  • Range · +48 km (+10%)+14 pts
  • Charging · DC charging 170 kW (+20)+9 pts

Trade-offs

  • Practicality · boot 235 l (−285)−16 pts
View model
2nd place2/9
BYD Sealion 7

BYD

Sealion 7

Compared version: Comfort

from€48,800

29 dealers · 25 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #6 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

  • Practicality · boot 520 l (+285)+16 pts

Trade-offs

  • Performance · 0–100 km/h in 6.7 s (+2.1 s)−15 pts
  • Range · −48 km (−9%)−14 pts
  • Charging · DC charging 150 kW (−20)−9 pts
View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

BYD

Tang

7

BYD

Sealion 7

2

BYD Tang leads: 7 of 9 criteria won clearly. 5 criteria are tied.

  • Price & warrantytie
  • Battery & charging40
  • Performance21
  • Dimensions & practicality11
  • Safetytie

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

  • Value

    not enough data

  • Range

    BYD Tang+14 pts

  • Performance

    BYD Tang+15 pts

  • Safety

    tight

  • Practicality

    BYD Sealion 7+16 pts

  • Charging

    BYD Tang+9 pts

BYD Tang has the longest range; BYD Sealion 7 has 48 km less (−9%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

BYD Tangunranked
BYD Sealion 767

Value

BYD Tangn/a
BYD Sealion 758

Range

+14 pts
BYD Tang80
BYD Sealion 766

Performance

+15 pts
BYD Tang86
BYD Sealion 771

Safety

tight
BYD Tang88
BYD Sealion 788

Practicality

+16 pts
BYD Tang53
BYD Sealion 769

Charging

+9 pts
BYD Tang60
BYD Sealion 751

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

  • best in the comparison
  • ≈equal: within 5% of the best
  • 5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
  • > 20%far behind: more than 20%
  • n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

BYD

Tang

BYD

Sealion 7

€48,800

Price from
n/a

€48,800

Top price in range
n/a

€58,000

Warranty

6 years / 150,000 km

6 years / 150,000 km

Battery capacity

108.8 kWh

best

4.9 km/kWh

82.5 kWh

−24%−26.3 kWh

5.8 km/kWh

WLTP range

530 km

best

482 km

−9%−48 km
DC charging power

170 kW

best

150 kW

−12%−20 kW
DC charging time

30 min

best

32 min

+7%+2 min
AC charging power

11 kW

11 kW

Power

517 hp · 380 kW

best

313 hp · 230 kW

−39%−204 hp
Torque

700 Nm

best

690 Nm

≈ equal
Top speed

190 km/h

−12%−25 km/h

215 km/h

best
0–100 km/h

4.6 s

best

6.7 s

+46%+2.1 s
Drive

AWD

RWD

Length

4,970 mm

4,830 mm

Width

1,955 mm

1,925 mm

Height

1,745 mm

1,620 mm

Wheelbase

2,820 mm

≈ equal

2,930 mm

best
Boot volume

235 l

−55%−285 l

520 l

best
Seats

7

best

5

−29%−2
Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

5 ★

EU homologated

Yes

Yes

Data verified
09/27/2026
09/27/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

BYD Tang

Euro NCAP (decembrie 2023): BYD Tang 5 stele, 87% protecția adulților și 87% protecția copiilor.

TangEuro NCAP
byd.comofficialEurope / global

Pe 20 ianuarie 2026 BYD a anunțat extinderea retroactivă a garanției bateriei Blade în SEE/UK/Elveția la 8 ani sau 250.000 km cu SOH minim 70% (anterior 8 ani/200.000 km), valabilă pentru toate modelele EV și Super Hybrid deja vândute și noi.

Warranty & assistance
automarket.romediaRomania
Warranty

Manualul de garanție limitată BYD (versiune RO, ianuarie 2026): vehicul 72 luni/150.000 km; baterie HV 96 luni/250.000 km cu SOH minim 70%; unitate de propulsie 96 luni/150.000 km; anticoroziune 144 luni; baterie 12V 24 luni; anumite piese (suspensie, rulmenți, multimedia) 48 luni/120.000 km.

Warranty & assistance
byd.comofficialEurope / global

BYD Sealion 7

Euro NCAP (9 aprilie 2025): 5 stele – Adulți 87%, Copii 93%, Pietoni/bicicliști 76%, Asistență 79%. Slăbiciuni: protecție „slabă” a toracelui pasagerului din spate la testul cu barieră rigidă; rezultate slabe la stâlpii parbrizului pentru capul pietonului.

Sealion 7Euro NCAP
euroncap.comofficialEurope / global

ADAC Autotest (27 februarie 2026): consum Ecotest 24,1 kWh/100 km inclusiv pierderi la încărcare, autonomie ADAC ≈430 km, putere de încărcare DC maximă 226 kW și medie 173,1 kW până la 80%; 4 din 5 stele Ecotest din cauza consumului ridicat.

Sealion 7 Excellence AWDIndependent tests (ADAC, Green NCAP, Autocritica)
adac.deofficialEurope / global

ADAC, test de iarnă 2026 (0°C, 111 km/h medie): autonomie 293 km față de 502 km WLTP (≈58%), consum 35,3 kWh/100 km față de 21,9 WLTP; în 20 min de încărcare a recuperat 161 km; climatizarea automată nu menținea temperatura țintă; cel mai mare consum din test.

Sealion 7 Excellence AWDIndependent tests (ADAC, Green NCAP, Autocritica)
adac.deofficialEurope / global

Green NCAP (decembrie 2025): BYD Sealion 7 4 stele, index general 8,4/10; consum măsurat: 19,9 kWh/100 km (WLTP lab), 21,6 (vreme caldă), 31,3 (autostradă), 25,3–29,5 (iarnă).

Sealion 7 Comfort RWDIndependent tests (ADAC, Green NCAP, Autocritica)
greenncap.comofficialEurope / global

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

Frequently asked questions

Which has more range, the BYD Tang or the BYD Sealion 7?

The BYD Tang has more range: 530 km versus 482 km WLTP, 48 km more.

Which is more powerful, the BYD Tang or the BYD Sealion 7?

The BYD Tang is more powerful: 517 hp versus 313 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the BYD Tang or the BYD Sealion 7?

The BYD Tang scores higher overall: 75/100 versus 67/100.

Add more models to this comparison