Head-to-head comparison

XPeng X9 vs Zeekr 001

Winner6/11

XPeng

X9

Compared version: Standard range

from€74,890

4 dealers · 4 counties

61/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Good

Ranked #10 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)MPVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 11/12 fields

Leads on

Charging · DC charging 537 kW (+337)+32 pts
Practicality · boot 721 l (+182)+26 pts

Trade-offs

Value−29 pts
Safety−25 pts
Range · −95 km (−15%)−21 pts

View model

2nd place5/11

Zeekr

001

Compared version: Long Range RWD

from€58,490

2 dealers · 2 counties

69/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #3 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)Wagon

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Value · €16,400 cheaper (−22%)+29 pts
Safety+25 pts
Range · +95 km (+18%)+21 pts

Trade-offs

Charging · DC charging 200 kW (−337)−32 pts
Practicality · boot 539 l (−182)−26 pts

View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

XPeng

Zeekr

001

XPeng X9 leads: 6 of 11 criteria won clearly. 2 criteria are tied.

Price & warranty01
Battery & charging23
Performance11
Dimensions & practicality30

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

Value
Zeekr 001+29 pts
Range
Zeekr 001+21 pts
Performance
tight
Safety
Zeekr 001+25 pts
Practicality
XPeng X9+26 pts
Charging
XPeng X9+32 pts

Zeekr 001 is the cheapest; XPeng X9 costs €16,400 more (+28%).

Zeekr 001 has the longest range; XPeng X9 has 95 km less (−15%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

XPeng X961

Zeekr 00169

Value

+29 pts

XPeng X916

Zeekr 00145

Range

+21 pts

XPeng X979

Zeekr 001100

Performance

tight

XPeng X960

Zeekr 00160

Safety

+25 pts

XPeng X950

Zeekr 00175

Practicality

+26 pts

XPeng X9100

Zeekr 00174

Charging

+32 pts

XPeng X9100

Zeekr 00168

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

XPeng

€74,890

Zeekr

001

€58,490

Price from

€74,890

+28%+16,400 €

€58,490

Top price in range

€89,390

€71,790

Warranty

5 years / 160,000 km

5 years / 100,000 km

Battery capacity

94.8 kWh

−5%−5.2 kWh

5.5 km/kWh

100 kWh

6.2 km/kWh

WLTP range

525 km

−15%−95 km

€143/km

620 km

€94/km

DC charging power

537 kW

200 kW

−63%−337 kW

DC charging time

12 min

30 min

+150%+18 min

AC charging power

11 kW

−50%−11 kW

22 kW

Power

320 hp · 235 kW

€234/hp

272 hp · 200 kW

−15%−48 hp

€215/hp

Torque

450 Nm

n/a

Top speed

200 km/h

0–100 km/h

8.2 s

+14%+1 s

7.2 s

Drive

FWD

RWD

Length

5,316 mm

4,970 mm

Width

1,988 mm

1,990 mm

Height

1,785 mm

1,560 mm

Wheelbase

3,160 mm

2,999 mm

−5%−161 mm

Boot volume

721 l

539 l

−25%−182 l

Seats

−29%−2

Euro NCAP rating

not tested

5 ★

Data verified

09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

XPeng X9

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Zeekr 001

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with Zeekr 001

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the XPeng X9 or the Zeekr 001?

The Zeekr 001 is cheaper, starting at €58,490 versus €74,890 for the XPeng X9 — a difference of €16,400.

Which has more range, the XPeng X9 or the Zeekr 001?

The Zeekr 001 has more range: 620 km versus 525 km WLTP, 95 km more.

Which is more powerful, the XPeng X9 or the Zeekr 001?

The XPeng X9 is more powerful: 320 hp versus 272 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the XPeng X9 or the Zeekr 001?

The Zeekr 001 scores higher overall: 69/100 versus 61/100.

Add more models to this comparison