Head-to-head comparison

XPeng G9 vs Zeekr 7X

2nd place4/9

XPeng

G9

Compared version: Standard range

from€59,390

4 dealers · 4 counties

69/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #5 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Practicality · boot 660 l (+121)+14 pts
Range · +22 km (+5%)+6 pts

Trade-offs

Value · €5,400 more expensive (+10%)−12 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 6.6 s (+0.6 s)−12 pts

View model

Winner5/9

Zeekr

7X

Compared version: Core RWD

from€53,990

2 dealers · 2 counties

71/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #2 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Value · €5,400 cheaper (−9%)+12 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 6 s (−0.6 s)+12 pts

Trade-offs

Practicality · boot 539 l (−121)−14 pts
Range · −22 km (−4%)−6 pts

View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

XPeng

Zeekr

Zeekr 7X leads: 5 of 9 criteria won clearly. 6 criteria are tied.

Price & warranty01
Battery & charging22
Performance12
Dimensions & practicality10
Safetytie

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

Value
Zeekr 7X+12 pts
Range
XPeng G9+6 pts
Performance
Zeekr 7X+12 pts
Safety
tight
Practicality
XPeng G9+14 pts
Charging
tight

Zeekr 7X is the cheapest; XPeng G9 costs €5,400 more (+10%).

XPeng G9 has the longest range; Zeekr 7X has 22 km less (−4%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

XPeng G969

Zeekr 7X71

Value

+12 pts

XPeng G944

Zeekr 7X56

Range

+6 pts

XPeng G972

Zeekr 7X66

Performance

+12 pts

XPeng G969

Zeekr 7X81

Safety

tight

XPeng G975

Zeekr 7X75

Practicality

+14 pts

XPeng G982

Zeekr 7X68

Charging

tight

XPeng G9100

Zeekr 7X100

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

XPeng

€59,390

Zeekr

€53,990

Price from

€59,390

+10%+5,400 €

€53,990

Top price in range

€73,890

€63,990

Warranty

5 years / 160,000 km

5 years / 100,000 km

Battery capacity

79 kWh

6.4 km/kWh

75 kWh

−5%−4 kWh

6.4 km/kWh

WLTP range

502 km

€118/km

480 km

≈ equal

€112/km

DC charging power

445 kW

−7%−35 kW

480 kW

DC charging time

12 min

13 min

+8%+1 min

AC charging power

11 kW

−50%−11 kW

22 kW

Power

346 hp · 258 kW

−18%−75 hp

€172/hp

421 hp · 310 kW

€128/hp

Torque

465 Nm

440 Nm

−5%−25 Nm

Top speed

200 km/h

≈ equal

210 km/h

0–100 km/h

6.6 s

+10%+0.6 s

6 s

Drive

RWD

Length

4,891 mm

4,825 mm

Width

1,937 mm

1,930 mm

Height

1,680 mm

1,660 mm

Wheelbase

2,998 mm

2,900 mm

≈ equal

Boot volume

660 l

539 l

−18%−121 l

Seats

Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

Data verified

09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

XPeng G9

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Zeekr 7X

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with XPeng G9

More comparisons with Zeekr 7X

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 7X?

The Zeekr 7X is cheaper, starting at €53,990 versus €59,390 for the XPeng G9 — a difference of €5,400.

Which has more range, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 7X?

The XPeng G9 has more range: 502 km versus 480 km WLTP, 22 km more.

Which is more powerful, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 7X?

The Zeekr 7X is more powerful: 421 hp versus 346 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 7X?

The Zeekr 7X scores higher overall: 71/100 versus 69/100.

Add more models to this comparison