Head-to-head comparison

XPeng G9 vs Zeekr 001

Winner5/8

XPeng

G9

Compared version: Standard range

from€59,390

4 dealers · 4 counties

69/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #5 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Charging · DC charging 445 kW (+245)+32 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 6.6 s (−0.6 s)+9 pts
Practicality · boot 660 l (+121)+8 pts

Trade-offs

Range · −118 km (−19%)−28 pts

View model

2nd place3/8

Zeekr

001

Compared version: Long Range RWD

from€58,490

2 dealers · 2 counties

69/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #3 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)Wagon

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Range · +118 km (+24%)+28 pts

Trade-offs

Charging · DC charging 200 kW (−245)−32 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 7.2 s (+0.6 s)−9 pts
Practicality · boot 539 l (−121)−8 pts

View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

XPeng

Zeekr

001

XPeng G9 leads: 5 of 8 criteria won clearly. 6 criteria are tied.

Price & warrantytie
Battery & charging23
Performance20
Dimensions & practicality10
Safetytie

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

Value
tight
Range
Zeekr 001+28 pts
Performance
XPeng G9+9 pts
Safety
tight
Practicality
XPeng G9+8 pts
Charging
XPeng G9+32 pts

Zeekr 001 is the cheapest; XPeng G9 costs €900 more (+2%).

Zeekr 001 has the longest range; XPeng G9 has 118 km less (−19%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

XPeng G969

Zeekr 00169

Value

tight

XPeng G944

Zeekr 00145

Range

+28 pts

XPeng G972

Zeekr 001100

Performance

+9 pts

XPeng G969

Zeekr 00160

Safety

tight

XPeng G975

Zeekr 00175

Practicality

+8 pts

XPeng G982

Zeekr 00174

Charging

+32 pts

XPeng G9100

Zeekr 00168

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

XPeng

€59,390

Zeekr

001

€58,490

Price from

€59,390

≈ equal

€58,490

Top price in range

€73,890

€71,790

Warranty

5 years / 160,000 km

5 years / 100,000 km

Battery capacity

79 kWh

−21%−21 kWh

6.4 km/kWh

100 kWh

6.2 km/kWh

WLTP range

502 km

−19%−118 km

€118/km

620 km

€94/km

DC charging power

445 kW

200 kW

−55%−245 kW

DC charging time

12 min

30 min

+150%+18 min

AC charging power

11 kW

−50%−11 kW

22 kW

Power

346 hp · 258 kW

€172/hp

272 hp · 200 kW

−21%−74 hp

€215/hp

Torque

465 Nm

n/a

Top speed

200 km/h

0–100 km/h

6.6 s

7.2 s

+9%+0.6 s

Drive

RWD

Length

4,891 mm

4,970 mm

Width

1,937 mm

1,990 mm

Height

1,680 mm

1,560 mm

Wheelbase

2,998 mm

≈ equal

2,999 mm

Boot volume

660 l

539 l

−18%−121 l

Seats

Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

Data verified

09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

XPeng G9

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Zeekr 001

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with XPeng G9

More comparisons with Zeekr 001

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 001?

The Zeekr 001 is cheaper, starting at €58,490 versus €59,390 for the XPeng G9 — a difference of €900.

Which has more range, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 001?

The Zeekr 001 has more range: 620 km versus 502 km WLTP, 118 km more.

Which is more powerful, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 001?

The XPeng G9 is more powerful: 346 hp versus 272 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the XPeng G9 or the Zeekr 001?

The XPeng G9 and the Zeekr 001 are level on the ChinaCars Score, both at 69/100.

Add more models to this comparison