Head-to-head comparison

Skywell ET5 vs XPeng G6

2nd place0/7

Skywell

ET5

Compared version: ET5 Premium

from€44,249

1 dealer · 1 county

Unranked — insufficient data

not sold in Romania, or availability unconfirmed

Battery Electric (BEV)SUVAvailability unconfirmedNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 10/12 fields

Leads on

No lead of 5 points or more

Trade-offs

Charging · DC charging 75 kW (−307)−87 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 9.6 s (+2.7 s)−34 pts
Safety−25 pts

View model

Winner7/7

XPeng

G6

Compared version: Standard range

from€43,990

4 dealers · 4 counties

69/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #4 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Charging · DC charging 382 kW (+307)+87 pts
Performance · 0–100 km/h in 6.9 s (−2.7 s)+34 pts
Safety+25 pts

Trade-offs

No trade-off of 5 points or more

View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

Skywell

ET5

XPeng

XPeng G6 leads: 7 of 7 criteria won clearly. 5 criteria are tied.

Price & warrantytie
Battery & charging02
Performance04
Dimensions & practicality01

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

Value
XPeng G6+13 pts
Range
XPeng G6+23 pts
Performance
XPeng G6+34 pts
Safety
XPeng G6+25 pts
Practicality
XPeng G6+12 pts
Charging
XPeng G6+87 pts

XPeng G6 is the cheapest; Skywell ET5 costs €259 more (+1%).

XPeng G6 has the longest range; Skywell ET5 has 80 km less (−17%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

Skywell ET5unranked

XPeng G669

Value

+13 pts

Skywell ET548

XPeng G661

Range

+23 pts

Skywell ET543

XPeng G666

Performance

+34 pts

Skywell ET526

XPeng G660

Safety

+25 pts

Skywell ET550

XPeng G675

Practicality

+12 pts

Skywell ET558

XPeng G670

Charging

+87 pts

Skywell ET513

XPeng G6100

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

Skywell

ET5

€44,249

XPeng

€43,990

Price from

€44,249

≈ equal

€43,990

Top price in range

n/a

€55,490

Warranty

5 years / 150,000 km

5 years / 160,000 km

Battery capacity

72 kWh

5.6 km/kWh

68.5 kWh

≈ equal

7 km/kWh

WLTP range

400 km

−17%−80 km

€111/km

480 km

€92/km

DC charging power

75 kW

−80%−307 kW

382 kW

DC charging time

n/a

12 min

AC charging power

n/a

11 kW

Power

204 hp · 150 kW

−18%−44 hp

€217/hp

248 hp · 185 kW

€177/hp

Torque

320 Nm

−27%−120 Nm

440 Nm

Top speed

150 km/h

−26%−52 km/h

202 km/h

0–100 km/h

9.6 s

+39%+2.7 s

6.9 s

Drive

FWD

RWD

Length

n/a

4,758 mm

Width

n/a

1,920 mm

Height

n/a

1,650 mm

Wheelbase

2,800 mm

≈ equal

2,890 mm

Boot volume

467 l

−18%−104 l

571 l

Seats

Euro NCAP rating

not tested

5 ★

Data verified

09/27/2026

09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

Skywell ET5

No verified facts yet

View the model page

XPeng G6

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with XPeng G6

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the Skywell ET5 or the XPeng G6?

The XPeng G6 is cheaper, starting at €43,990 versus €44,249 for the Skywell ET5 — a difference of €259.

Which has more range, the Skywell ET5 or the XPeng G6?

The XPeng G6 has more range: 480 km versus 400 km WLTP, 80 km more.

Which is more powerful, the Skywell ET5 or the XPeng G6?

The XPeng G6 is more powerful: 248 hp versus 204 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the Skywell ET5 or the XPeng G6?

The XPeng G6 scores higher overall: 69/100 versus 42/100.

Add more models to this comparison