Head-to-head comparison

SERES 5 vs XPeng G9

2nd place0/9

SERES

SERES 5

Compared version: SERES 5 Standard, 2WD, Electric, Autonomie 500 km, 80kWh, 294 CP

from€73,379

2 dealers · 2 counties

40/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Average

Ranked #19 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 11/12 fields

Leads on

No lead of 5 points or more

Trade-offs

Charging · DC charging 100 kW (−345)−85 pts
Safety · warranty 4 years (−1)−50 pts
Value−31 pts

View model

Winner9/9

XPeng

G9

Compared version: Standard range

from€59,390

4 dealers · 4 counties

69/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #5 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Charging · DC charging 445 kW (+345)+85 pts
Safety · warranty 5 years (+1)+50 pts
Value · €13,989 cheaper (−19%)+31 pts

Trade-offs

No trade-off of 5 points or more

View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

SERES

SERES 5

XPeng

XPeng G9 leads: 9 of 9 criteria won clearly. 5 criteria are tied.

Price & warranty02
Battery & charging02
Performance04
Dimensions & practicality01

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

Value
XPeng G9+31 pts
Range
tight
Performance
XPeng G9+13 pts
Safety
XPeng G9+50 pts
Practicality
XPeng G9+27 pts
Charging
XPeng G9+85 pts

XPeng G9 is the cheapest; SERES 5 costs €13,989 more (+24%).

XPeng G9 has the longest range; SERES 5 has 2 km less (0%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

SERES 540

XPeng G969

Value

+31 pts

SERES 513

XPeng G944

Range

tight

SERES 571

XPeng G972

Performance

+13 pts

SERES 556

XPeng G969

Safety

+50 pts

SERES 525

XPeng G975

Practicality

+27 pts

SERES 555

XPeng G982

Charging

+85 pts

SERES 515

XPeng G9100

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

SERES 5

€73,379

XPeng

€59,390

Price from

€73,379

+24%+13,989 €

€59,390

Top price in range

€75,976

€73,890

Warranty

4 years / 100,000 km

−20%−1 year

5 years / 160,000 km

Battery capacity

80 kWh

6.3 km/kWh

79 kWh

≈ equal

6.4 km/kWh

WLTP range

500 km

≈ equal

€147/km

502 km

€118/km

DC charging power

100 kW

−78%−345 kW

445 kW

DC charging time

44 min

+267%+32 min

12 min

AC charging power

11 kW

Power

294 hp · 220 kW

−15%−52 hp

€250/hp

346 hp · 258 kW

€172/hp

Torque

420 Nm

−10%−45 Nm

465 Nm

Top speed

180 km/h

−10%−20 km/h

200 km/h

0–100 km/h

7 s

+6%+0.4 s

6.6 s

Drive

RWD

Length

4,710 mm

4,891 mm

Width

1,930 mm

1,937 mm

Height

1,620 mm

1,680 mm

Wheelbase

2,875 mm

≈ equal

2,998 mm

Boot volume

367 l

−44%−293 l

660 l

Seats

Euro NCAP rating

not tested

5 ★

Data verified

09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

SERES 5

No verified facts yet

View the model page

XPeng G9

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with XPeng G9

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the SERES 5 or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 is cheaper, starting at €59,390 versus €73,379 for the SERES 5 — a difference of €13,989.

Which has more range, the SERES 5 or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 has more range: 502 km versus 500 km WLTP, 2 km more.

Which is more powerful, the SERES 5 or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 is more powerful: 346 hp versus 294 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the SERES 5 or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 scores higher overall: 69/100 versus 40/100.

Add more models to this comparison