Head-to-head comparison

Lynk & Co 08 vs XPeng G6

Lynk & Co 08

Lynk & Co

08

Compared version: Core+

from€55,990

6 dealers · 5 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #5 of 17 ranked plug-in hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)SUV

Data: 9/10 fields

Leads on

  • Range+34 pts

Trade-offs

  • Safety · warranty 4 years (−1)−12 pts
  • Value−11 pts
  • Price · €12,000 more expensive (+27%)
View model
XPeng G6

XPeng

G6

Compared version: Standard range

from€43,990

4 dealers · 4 counties

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #4 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUV

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

  • Safety · warranty 5 years (+1)+12 pts
  • Value · €12,000 cheaper (−21%)+11 pts

Trade-offs

  • Range−34 pts
View model

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

You are comparing different categories: plug-in hybrid (Lynk & Co 08) and electric (XPeng G6). The Charging axis does not apply to every model, so we compare on Value, Range, Performance, Safety, and Practicality. Overall scores are not directly comparable across categories.

  • Value

    XPeng G6+11 pts

  • Range

    Lynk & Co 08+34 pts

  • Performance

    tight

  • Safety

    XPeng G6+12 pts

  • Practicality

    tight

  • Charging

    does not apply

XPeng G6 is the cheapest; Lynk & Co 08 costs €12,000 more (+27%).

XPeng G6 has the longest range; Lynk & Co 08 has 280 km less (−58%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score· not directly comparable across categories

Lynk & Co 0869
XPeng G669

Value

Lynk & Co 0850
XPeng G661

Range

Lynk & Co 08100
XPeng G666

Performance

Lynk & Co 0862
XPeng G660

Safety

Lynk & Co 0863
XPeng G675

Practicality

Lynk & Co 0869
XPeng G670

Charging

Lynk & Co 08—
XPeng G6100

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

  • ✓best in the comparison
  • ≈equal: within 5% of the best
  • 5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
  • > 20%far behind: more than 20%
  • n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

Lynk & Co

08

€55,990

XPeng

G6

€43,990

Price from

€55,990

+27%+12,000 €

€43,990

best
Top price in range

€59,990

€55,490

Warranty

4 years

−20%−1 year

5 years / 160,000 km

best
Battery capacity

39.6 kWh

−42%−28.9 kWh

5.1 km/kWh

68.5 kWh

best

7 km/kWh

WLTP range

200 km

−58%−280 km

€280/km

480 km

best

€92/km

DC charging power

85 kW

−78%−297 kW

382 kW

best
DC charging time

33 min

+175%+21 min

12 min

best
AC charging power

11 kW

11 kW

Power

345 hp · 257 kW

best

€162/hp

248 hp · 185 kW

−28%−97 hp

€177/hp

Torque
n/a

440 Nm

Top speed

185 km/h

−8%−17 km/h

202 km/h

best
0–100 km/h

6.8 s

best

6.9 s

≈ equal
Drive
n/a

RWD

Length
n/a

4,758 mm

Width
n/a

1,920 mm

Height
n/a

1,650 mm

Wheelbase
n/a

2,890 mm

Boot volume

540 l

−5%−31 l

571 l

best
Seats

5

5

Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

5 ★

Data verified
09/27/2026
09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

Lynk & Co 08

No verified facts yet

View the model page

XPeng G6

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the Lynk & Co 08 or the XPeng G6?

The XPeng G6 is cheaper, starting at €43,990 versus €55,990 for the Lynk & Co 08 — a difference of €12,000.

Which has more range, the Lynk & Co 08 or the XPeng G6?

The XPeng G6 has more range: 480 km versus 200 km WLTP, 280 km more.

Which is more powerful, the Lynk & Co 08 or the XPeng G6?

The Lynk & Co 08 is more powerful: 345 hp versus 248 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the Lynk & Co 08 or the XPeng G6?

The Lynk & Co 08 and the XPeng G6 are level on the ChinaCars Score, both at 69/100.

Add more models to this comparison