Head-to-head comparison

Lynk & Co 02 vs XPeng L03

2nd place3/7

Lynk & Co

02

Compared version: 02 Core+

from€37,490

6 dealers · 5 counties

60/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Good

Ranked #12 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)Hatchback

Data: 12/12 fields

Leads on

Performance · 0–100 km/h in 5.5 s (−2 s)+13 pts
Safety+13 pts

Trade-offs

Charging · DC charging 150 kW (−43)−31 pts
Practicality · boot 410 l (−84)−10 pts

View model

Winner4/7

XPeng

L03

Compared version: Standard Range

from€36,990

4 dealers · 4 counties

61/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Good

Ranked #11 of 21 ranked BEV

Battery Electric (BEV)SUVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 11/12 fields

Leads on

Charging · DC charging 193 kW (+43)+31 pts
Practicality · boot 494 l (+84)+10 pts

Trade-offs

Performance · 0–100 km/h in 7.5 s (+2 s)−13 pts
Safety−13 pts

View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

Lynk & Co

XPeng

L03

XPeng L03 leads: 4 of 7 criteria won clearly. 6 criteria are tied.

Price & warranty01
Battery & charging12
Performance20
Dimensions & practicality01

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

Value
tight
Range
tight
Performance
Lynk & Co 02+13 pts
Safety
Lynk & Co 02+13 pts
Practicality
XPeng L03+10 pts
Charging
XPeng L03+31 pts

XPeng L03 is the cheapest; Lynk & Co 02 costs €500 more (+1%).

XPeng L03 has the longest range; Lynk & Co 02 has 10 km less (−2%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

Lynk & Co 0260

XPeng L0361

Value

tight

Lynk & Co 0273

XPeng L0370

Range

tight

Lynk & Co 0253

XPeng L0356

Performance

+13 pts

Lynk & Co 0260

XPeng L0347

Safety

+13 pts

Lynk & Co 0263

XPeng L0350

Practicality

+10 pts

Lynk & Co 0252

XPeng L0362

Charging

+31 pts

Lynk & Co 0255

XPeng L0386

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

Lynk & Co

€37,490

XPeng

L03

€36,990

Price from

€37,490

≈ equal

€36,990

Top price in range

€41,490

€48,490

Warranty

4 years

−20%−1 year

5 years / 160,000 km

Battery capacity

66 kWh

6.6 km/kWh

58.2 kWh

−12%−7.8 kWh

7.6 km/kWh

WLTP range

435 km

≈ equal

€86/km

445 km

€83/km

DC charging power

150 kW

−22%−43 kW

193 kW

DC charging time

30 min

+50%+10 min

20 min

AC charging power

11 kW

Power

272 hp · 200 kW

€138/hp

222 hp · 163 kW

−18%−50 hp

€167/hp

Torque

343 Nm

n/a

Top speed

180 km/h

0–100 km/h

5.5 s

7.5 s

+36%+2 s

Drive

RWD

Length

n/a

4,650 mm

Width

n/a

1,920 mm

Height

n/a

1,600 mm

Wheelbase

2,755 mm

≈ equal

2,850 mm

Boot volume

410 l

−17%−84 l

494 l

Seats

Euro NCAP rating

5 ★

not tested

Data verified

09/27/2026

09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

Lynk & Co 02

No verified facts yet

View the model page

XPeng L03

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with XPeng L03

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the Lynk & Co 02 or the XPeng L03?

The XPeng L03 is cheaper, starting at €36,990 versus €37,490 for the Lynk & Co 02 — a difference of €500.

Which has more range, the Lynk & Co 02 or the XPeng L03?

The XPeng L03 has more range: 445 km versus 435 km WLTP, 10 km more.

Which is more powerful, the Lynk & Co 02 or the XPeng L03?

The Lynk & Co 02 is more powerful: 272 hp versus 222 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the Lynk & Co 02 or the XPeng L03?

The XPeng L03 scores higher overall: 61/100 versus 60/100.

Add more models to this comparison