Head-to-head comparison

Farizon SV vs Maxus eTerron 9

Tied 1st1/2
Farizon SV

Farizon

SV

Compared version: SV 6,95 m³ 49 kWh L1H1

from€48,399

2 dealers · 2 counties

Unranked — insufficient data

commercial vehicle — not ranked with passenger cars

Battery Electric (BEV)VanNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 9/12 fields

Leads on

  • Value · €27,141 cheaper (−36%)+35 pts

Trade-offs

  • Range · −215 km (−50%)−51 pts
  • Safety−50 pts
View model
Tied 1st1/2
Maxus eTerron 9

Maxus

eTerron 9

Compared version: 4x4

from€75,540

2 dealers · 2 counties

Unranked — insufficient data

commercial vehicle — not ranked with passenger cars · missing: performance · missing: practicality · missing: charging · coverage below 70 %

Battery Electric (BEV)Pickup

Data: 3/12 fields

Leads on

  • Range · +215 km (+100%)+51 pts
  • Safety+50 pts

Trade-offs

  • Value−35 pts
  • Price · €27,141 more expensive (+56%)
View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

Farizon

SV

1

Maxus

eTerron 9

1

Level: 1 points each out of 2 decided criteria.

  • Price & warranty10
  • Battery & charging01

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

Incomplete comparison. Maxus eTerron 9 has no: power, 0–100 acceleration, top speed, warranty, boot space, seats, wheelbase, DC charging power, and DC charging time. Its strengths may be understated; missing data is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage.

  • Value

    Farizon SV+35 pts

  • Range

    Maxus eTerron 9+51 pts

  • Performance

    not enough data

  • Safety

    Maxus eTerron 9+50 pts

  • Practicality

    not enough data

  • Charging

    not enough data

Farizon SV is the cheapest; Maxus eTerron 9 costs €27,141 more (+56%).

Maxus eTerron 9 has the longest range; Farizon SV has 215 km less (−50%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score

Farizon SVunranked
Maxus eTerron 9unranked

Value

+35 pts
Farizon SV35
Maxus eTerron 90

Range

+51 pts
Farizon SV0
Maxus eTerron 951

Performance

Farizon SV24
Maxus eTerron 9n/a

Safety

+50 pts
Farizon SV50
Maxus eTerron 9100

Practicality

Farizon SV77
Maxus eTerron 9n/a

Charging

Farizon SV40
Maxus eTerron 9n/a

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

  • best in the comparison
  • ≈equal: within 5% of the best
  • 5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
  • > 20%far behind: more than 20%
  • n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

Farizon

SV

€48,399

Maxus

eTerron 9

€75,540

Price from

€48,399

best

€75,540

+56%+27,141 €
Top price in range

€68,728

n/a
Warranty

5 years / 200,000 km

n/a
Battery capacity

49 kWh

n/a
WLTP range

215 km

−50%−215 km

€225/km

430 km

best

€176/km

DC charging power

130 kW

n/a
AC charging power

6.6 kW

n/a
Power

272 hp · 200 kW

n/a
Top speed

135 km/h

n/a
Drive

FWD

AWD

Wheelbase

3,100 mm

n/a
Boot volume

6,950 l

n/a
Seats

3

n/a
Euro NCAP rating

not tested

5 ★

Data verified
09/26/2026
09/27/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

Farizon SV

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Maxus eTerron 9

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the Farizon SV or the Maxus eTerron 9?

The Farizon SV is cheaper, starting at €48,399 versus €75,540 for the Maxus eTerron 9 — a difference of €27,141.

Which has more range, the Farizon SV or the Maxus eTerron 9?

The Maxus eTerron 9 has more range: 430 km versus 215 km WLTP, 215 km more.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the Farizon SV or the Maxus eTerron 9?

The Maxus eTerron 9 scores higher overall: 42/100 versus 36/100.

Add more models to this comparison