Head-to-head comparison

Chery Tiggo 9 CSH vs Jaecoo 7 SHS-H

Chery

Tiggo 9 CSH

Compared version: Unique AWD

from€47,000

29 dealers · 26 counties

Unranked — insufficient data

missing: range · coverage below 70 %

Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)SUVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 4/10 fields

Leads on

Practicality · 7 seats+53 pts
Performance · 428 hp (+204)+40 pts

Trade-offs

Price · €12,510 more expensive (+36%)

View model

Jaecoo

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H

Compared version: JAECOO 7 SHS-H CONFORT

from€34,490

12 dealers · 12 counties

66/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Very good

Ranked #7 of 21 ranked combustion

Hybrid (HEV)SUVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 8/9 fields

Leads on

No lead of 5 points or more

Trade-offs

Practicality · 5 seats−53 pts
Performance · 224 hp (−204)−40 pts

View model

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

You are comparing different categories: plug-in hybrid (Chery Tiggo 9 CSH) and combustion (Jaecoo 7 SHS-H). The Range axis does not apply to every model, so we compare on Value, Performance, Safety, and Practicality. Overall scores are not directly comparable across categories.

Incomplete comparison. Chery Tiggo 9 CSH has no: 0–100 acceleration, top speed, Euro NCAP rating, boot space, wheelbase, and range. Its strengths may be understated; missing data is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage.

Value
tight
Range
does not apply
Performance
Chery Tiggo 9 CSH+40 pts
Safety
tight
Practicality
Chery Tiggo 9 CSH+53 pts

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H is the cheapest; Chery Tiggo 9 CSH costs €12,510 more (+36%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score· not directly comparable across categories

Chery Tiggo 9 CSHunranked

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H66

Value

Chery Tiggo 9 CSH71

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H72

Range

Chery Tiggo 9 CSHn/a

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H—

Performance

Chery Tiggo 9 CSH82

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H42

Safety

Chery Tiggo 9 CSH100

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H100

Practicality

Chery Tiggo 9 CSH100

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H47

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

✓best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

Chery

Tiggo 9 CSH

€47,000

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H

€34,490

Price from

€47,000

+36%+12,510 €

€34,490

Top price in range

n/a

€37,490

Warranty

7 years / 150,000 km

Battery capacity

34.5 kWh

1.8 kWh

−95%−32.7 kWh

Power

428 hp · 315 kW

€110/hp

224 hp · 165 kW

−48%−204 hp

€154/hp

Top speed

n/a

180 km/h

0–100 km/h

n/a

8.9 s

Drive

AWD

FWD

Wheelbase

n/a

2,672 mm

Boot volume

n/a

412 l

Seats

−29%−2

EU homologated

Yes

Data verified

09/27/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

Chery Tiggo 9 CSH

Warranty2025

Chery România: garanție mecanică 7 ani/150.000 km, 8 ani/160.000 km pentru baterie, motor electric și electronică la modelele Super Hybrid, vopsea 3 ani, perforare 12 ani; asistență rutieră 24/7 pe toată durata garanției; depozit central de piese în București cu livrare în 24 h.

Warranty & assistance

cheryromania.roofficialRomania

Jaecoo 7 SHS-H

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

More comparisons with Chery Tiggo 9 CSH

More comparisons with Jaecoo 7 SHS-H

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the Chery Tiggo 9 CSH or the Jaecoo 7 SHS-H?

The Jaecoo 7 SHS-H is cheaper, starting at €34,490 versus €47,000 for the Chery Tiggo 9 CSH — a difference of €12,510.

Which is more powerful, the Chery Tiggo 9 CSH or the Jaecoo 7 SHS-H?

The Chery Tiggo 9 CSH is more powerful: 428 hp versus 224 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the Chery Tiggo 9 CSH or the Jaecoo 7 SHS-H?

The Chery Tiggo 9 CSH scores higher overall: 86/100 versus 66/100.

Add more models to this comparison