Head-to-head comparison

BAW 212 vs Lynk & Co 01

2nd place0/3

BAW

BAW 212

Entry version

from€44,850

2 dealers · 2 counties

Unranked — insufficient data

missing: safety & warranty · coverage below 70 %

Internal Combustion (ICE)SUVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 5/9 fields

Leads on

Practicality · wheelbase 2,860 mm (+126)+11 pts

Trade-offs

Performance · 166 hp (−110)−34 pts
Value · €2,851 more expensive (+7%)−30 pts

View model

Winner3/3

Lynk & Co

01

Compared version: Noul 01 Core+

from€41,999

6 dealers · 5 counties

49/100

ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0

Average

Ranked #17 of 17 ranked plug-in hybrid

Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)SUVNot Euro NCAP tested

Data: 9/10 fields

Leads on

Performance · 276 hp (+110)+34 pts
Value · €2,851 cheaper (−6%)+30 pts

Trade-offs

Practicality · wheelbase 2,734 mm (−126)−11 pts

View model

The duel in points

One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.

BAW

BAW 212

Lynk & Co

Lynk & Co 01 leads: 3 of 3 criteria won clearly. 2 criteria are tied.

Price & warranty01
Performance02
Dimensions & practicalitytie

What matters to you?

Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.

Who leads on what

On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.

You are comparing different categories: combustion (BAW 212) and plug-in hybrid (Lynk & Co 01). The Range axis does not apply to every model, so we compare on Value, Performance, Safety, and Practicality. Overall scores are not directly comparable across categories.

Incomplete comparison. BAW 212 has no: 0–100 acceleration, Euro NCAP rating, warranty, and boot space. Its strengths may be understated; missing data is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage.

Value
Lynk & Co 01+30 pts
Range
does not apply
Performance
Lynk & Co 01+34 pts
Safety
not enough data
Practicality
BAW 212+11 pts

Lynk & Co 01 is the cheapest; BAW 212 costs €2,851 more (+7%).

Score axes

Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.

How we calculate the score

Overall score· not directly comparable across categories

BAW 212unranked

Lynk & Co 0149

Value

+30 pts

BAW 21235

Lynk & Co 0165

Range

BAW 212—

Lynk & Co 0136

Performance

+34 pts

BAW 21225

Lynk & Co 0159

Safety

BAW 212n/a

Lynk & Co 0125

Practicality

+11 pts

BAW 21265

Lynk & Co 0154

Specifications

Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.

How to read the table

best in the comparison
≈equal: within 5% of the best
5–20%behind: 5–20% from the best
> 20%far behind: more than 20%
n/a: no data — never counted as a difference

BAW 212

€44,850

Lynk & Co

€41,999

Price from

€44,850

+7%+2,851 €

€41,999

Top price in range

n/a

€45,999

Warranty

n/a

4 years

Battery capacity

n/a

17.7 kWh

WLTP range

n/a

75 km

AC charging power

n/a

6.6 kW

Power

166 hp · 122 kW

−40%−110 hp

€270/hp

276 hp · 206 kW

€152/hp

Torque

n/a

425 Nm

Top speed

160 km/h

−20%−40 km/h

200 km/h

0–100 km/h

n/a

7.7 s

Drive

AWD

FWD

Length

4,705 mm

4,512 mm

Width

1,895 mm

1,857 mm

Height

1,936 mm

1,673 mm

Wheelbase

2,860 mm

2,734 mm

≈ equal

Boot volume

n/a

466 l

Seats

Data verified

09/25/2026

09/26/2026

Verified facts

With source and date, for each model in the comparison.

BAW 212

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Lynk & Co 01

No verified facts yet

View the model page

Request a quote or a test drive

We pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the BAW 212 or the Lynk & Co 01?

The Lynk & Co 01 is cheaper, starting at €41,999 versus €44,850 for the BAW 212 — a difference of €2,851.

Which is more powerful, the BAW 212 or the Lynk & Co 01?

The Lynk & Co 01 is more powerful: 276 hp versus 166 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the BAW 212 or the Lynk & Co 01?

The Lynk & Co 01 scores higher overall: 49/100 versus 40/100.

Add more models to this comparison