Head-to-head comparison
BAIC
Compared version: BAIC Beijing BJ40 PRO, 4WD, 234 CP, Off-Road SUV, 2.0 Turbo
from€46,751
3 dealers · 3 counties
ChinaCars Score · methodology v1.0
Good
Ranked #21 of 21 ranked combustion
Data: 7/9 fields
BAW
Entry version
from€44,850
2 dealers · 2 counties
Unranked — insufficient data
missing: safety & warranty · coverage below 70 %
Data: 5/9 fields
One point for every criterion won clearly: the best value, with the others more than 5% behind. Ties give no points.
BAIC
BJ40 PRO
2
BAW
BAW 212
0
BAIC BJ40 PRO leads: 2 of 2 criteria won clearly. 3 criteria are tied.
Pick a profile and we recalculate a score with its weights, here only. We do not choose for you.
On each score axis, the model at least 5 points ahead of the next one. Below that we write “tight”.
Incomplete comparison. BAW 212 has no: 0–100 acceleration, Euro NCAP rating, warranty, and boot space. Its strengths may be understated; missing data is neither an advantage nor a disadvantage.
Value
BAIC BJ40 PRO+15 pts
Performance
BAIC BJ40 PRO+14 pts
Safety
not enough data
Practicality
BAW 212+8 pts
BAW 212 is the cheapest; BAIC BJ40 PRO costs €1,901 more (+4%).
Absolute 0–100 score on fixed scales, calculated for each model's entry version.
Differences are measured against the best in the comparison.
How to read the table
BAIC
BJ40 PRO
€46,751
BAW 212
€44,850
€46,751
€44,850
6 years
234 hp · 172 kW
€200/hp
166 hp · 122 kW
€270/hp
390 Nm
170 km/h
160 km/h
AWD
AWD
4,790 mm
4,705 mm
1,940 mm
1,895 mm
1,895 mm
1,936 mm
2,760 mm
2,860 mm
490 l
5
5
With source and date, for each model in the comparison.
No verified facts yet
View the model pageNo verified facts yet
View the model pageWe pass your request to an authorised dealer of the chosen brand.
The BAW 212 is cheaper, starting at €44,850 versus €46,751 for the BAIC BJ40 PRO — a difference of €1,901.
The BAIC BJ40 PRO is more powerful: 234 hp versus 166 hp.
The BAIC BJ40 PRO scores higher overall: 54/100 versus 40/100.
