Head-to-head comparison

SWM G03F (Tiger) vs XPeng G9

Verdict

SWM G03F (Tiger) wins on Value and Practicality.

XPeng G9 wins on Range, Performance, and Charging.

SWM G03F (Tiger) is €39,840 cheaper.

ChinaCars Score

ChinaCars ScoreSWM G03F (Tiger)XPeng G9
Overall4669
Value7155
Range4094
Performance571
Safety3535
Practicality7570
Charging3097
Spec
SWM
G03F (Tiger)
XPeng
G9
PropulsionICEBEV
Segmentsuvsuv
Pricing€19,550€59,390
Battery Capacity—93.1 kWh
WLTP Range—585
Power Output116hp351hp
Torque—465
Top Speed—200
0-100 km/h—6.4s
Drive TypeFWDRWD
DC Charge Power—525.0 kW
Length4605mm4891mm
Width1815mm1937mm
Height1810mm1680mm
Wheelbase2780mm2998mm
Trunk Volume—660
Seats (Seats)75
EU Homologated

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, the SWM G03F (Tiger) or the XPeng G9?

The SWM G03F (Tiger) is cheaper, starting at €19,550 versus €59,390 for the XPeng G9 — a difference of €39,840.

Which is more powerful, the SWM G03F (Tiger) or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 is more powerful: 351 hp versus 116 hp.

Which scores higher on the ChinaCars Score, the SWM G03F (Tiger) or the XPeng G9?

The XPeng G9 scores higher overall: 69/100 versus 46/100.

Add more models to this comparison